For a start, he says it’s a “crummy photo”. It’s all pixelated and terrible. Well yes, the scan you have isn’t very good, but you can see from the original book that it’s much better (scan of my copy).
He also says it’s the only photo they took of it before they “destroyed it”. Again, no. The report he’s obviously seen describes how the process was photographed throughout, and there are numerous examples throughout the document he’s actually using, like these.
So his claim is just flat out not true.
Now for his claim that the one pictured with the astronauts at Surveyor crater is not the same one shown in the report. His main evidence is the nature of the silver foil around the top of the connecting cable, shown in this from the video
Well golly, it looks different! The foil seems to end at a different point. Surely it couldn;t be anything to do with the viewing angle? If only there was one with the camera viewed head on. Oh..wait!
How about if he do a direct comparison of the foil?
It’s an exact match. Who’d have thought it. All you needed was a better quality set of photos looking from the same angle. Oh, and actually be willing to look.
Smoking Gun #5 -
Back to Surveyor 3 for this one, which he covers here.
There’s a lot to unpack in his claims here, but at the core of it his argument is that the camera we see on Earth is not the camera from the Apollo 12 photos, because for some reason NASA wouldn’t bother to take the camera from the studio set he thinks they’re using and take photos of it. Seriously, it’s that dumb.
He’s using as his basis for the argument this image, which is from this document. A document of which I own an original copy.
Because I own a copy, I know that a number of the statements he makes are completely false
